South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the city choose 100-year flood protection for South Boulder Creek (SBC)?

The city has been evaluating flood mitigation options since 2010 and city council approved the SBC mitigation study in 2015. In 2020, city council considered three different levels of flood protection (100-, 200-, and 500- year) and ultimately passed a motion in support of the 100-yr flood design concept. This concept was found to have the fewest environmental impacts, the lowest cost and was identified to have the greatest probability of being permitted by the various regulatory agencies.

Why wasn’t 500-year flood protection chosen?

The project team evaluated 500-year conceptual designs and determined they were not feasible given project constraints. Specifically, the 500-year design concept was unable to match existing hydraulic loading conditions on the bridge structure and not increase flooding downstream. In other words, if the 500-year flood occurred under two scenarios: 1) with the city’s optimized 500-year flood project concept in place, and 2) under existing conditions without any flood mitigation features, the water depths would be higher under the US36 bridge under the 500-year flood project scenario. This violates fundamental criteria of regulated floodplain planning in that projects cannot make downstream flooding conditions worse. The 100-year design does not violate such criteria.

What was the magnitude of the 2013 flood?

The prolonged rainfall event in September 2013 resulted in storm runoff citywide. The flood magnitude as measured throughout various parts of Boulder ranged between a 25- and 50-year event for many watersheds. Portions of lower South Boulder Creek, including the West Valley, experienced flows on the order of a 100-year event 1.

The flood project is using a short-duration, high-intensity thunderstorm event as the basis for the design of the flood mitigation project. This type of storm is closest to the SBC flood flows experienced in 2013 despite the 2013 precipitation event being more characteristic of a long-duration, low-intensity general storm that results in lesser flood flows.

1. The South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Project is Phase 1 of three phases of flood mitigation for the South Boulder Creek major drainageway. The project would mitigate flooding for approximately 2,300 residents and 260 structures.
2. The South Boulder Creek Project is estimated to cost $66 million and would be paid for through Storm/Flood utility ratepayers.
3. Landowner arrangements with CU, the Office of Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) are at various process stages. The CU South Annexation Agreement establishes a land conveyance from CU to the city for flood mitigation. The City of Boulder Departments of Utilities and OSMP completed the OSMP land disposal process for former OSMP land along US36 that is needed for the floodwall. Lastly, an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) will be needed with CDOT for some project elements.

How much does the flood project cost and will taxpayer money be used to fund the SBC project?

The total estimated flood project cost is $66M. The project will be paid for by Stormwater and Flood utility fees included in monthly utility bills and in partnership with the Mile High Flood District.

What are “Enterprise Funds” and what are they used for?

Enterprise Funds are generated through the collection of fees in exchange for services. City of Boulder flood and stormwater utility fees are collected through customer utility bills in exchange for flood and stormwater services and are used to pay for project construction as well as indirect project components. Indirect project components can include environmental mitigation, property acquisition and community engagement related to the project, among others. 

Can Enterprise Funds be used to pay for indirect project costs, such as earthfill and tennis courts?

Yes. Boulder’s flood projects are frequently in the position of not owning the land needed for flood improvements. In these situations, Boulder must negotiate with landowners to reach agreement for use of the property. Project funds can be used to pay for resulting components of landowner agreements. 

In the case of CU South, the CU South Annexation Agreement states that the city not increase the 100- or 500-year floodplain on CU’s development zone, which will be addressed with earthfill, and that the city will demolish the existing tennis courts and warehouse building on the site as part of the flood project.

What is the project schedule?

How and where does the CU South Annexation Agreement provide for CU to develop?

The university owns a portion of the property needed for flood mitigation. The CU South Annexation Agreement set terms between the city and university and discuss use of the 308-acre parcel for flood mitigation, open space, recreation and future university development. A total of 129-acres of the 308-acre site (shown in the blue area and labeled - “PUB” below) are anticipated for university development.

Why will the university’s future development receive 500-year flood protection while existing Boulder residences in the West Valley only receive 100-year flood protection?

The 500-year flood protection design was determined infeasible. The city, county and university agreed that no enclosed structures (like housing) on CU South be permitted within the 500-year floodplain. Any new university housing will be outside the 500-year floodplain and the existing downstream neighborhoods will be provided with 100-yr flood protection and reduced risk during a 500-yr flood event.

How does the flood mitigation project factor into the City of Boulder’s larger sustainability goals and Climate Action Plan?

In addition to enhancing community safety, this project aligns with the city’s climate resilience goals. The focus on flood mitigation at CU Boulder South reflects a core principle of Boulder’s Climate Action Plan: climate action is not only about reducing emissions, but also about adapting to the impacts we are already experiencing. Alongside aggressive mitigation efforts, Boulder must plan for increasing risks such as flooding, extreme heat, wildfire and drought by integrating adaptation into land use, infrastructure, nature-based solutions and emergency preparedness. In that context, CU Boulder South represents a meaningful climate resilience partnership. By restoring floodplain function, preserving open space and incorporating nature-based approaches to reduce risk, the site supports both ecological health and community safety.

How does this project prioritize ecological preservation?

The CU South property has had different land uses and has experienced ecological changes over time. The necessary planning studies, assessments and discussions between CU and the city considered the ecology of the existing land and informed the 119 acres that will be restored and managed in the future as city open space. These 119 acres provide an opportunity for wetland and riparian preservation and restoration. A future site planning process will be completed for the 119 acres to inform the long-term goals of this area for open space uses, including any visitor use.

With which agencies is the city seeking permitting approval?

• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• U.S Fish and Wildlife Service
• Federal Emergency Management Agency
• Colorado Department of Transportation
• Colorado State Engineer’s Office
• City of Boulder

What is a disposal and why is it needed?

As flood mitigation is not a chartered purpose for city open space, a “disposal” process is required to take land out of city open space protection. City staff completed the disposal process with the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) in March 2024 for approximately 2.2 acres.

How will the project impact the existing environment?

The project is committed to minimizing and/or avoiding environmental and ecological impacts. South Boulder Creek is the second largest drainage route in Boulder, and this flood mitigation project has been found to have the fewest environmental impacts of the alternatives considered, including those to wetlands. Project design criteria includes replication of existing groundwater flow patterns to prevent upstream groundwater build up, drying up of downstream wetlands and other potential adverse impacts.

OSMP land within and surrounding the project area holds some of the highest ecological value anywhere in the Boulder Valley. The project area on OSMP property lies within the South Boulder Creek State Natural Area. This mosaic of mesic grasslands, wet meadows and high-quality wetlands was designated in 2000 by the State of Colorado in recognition of its state-wide significance as an exceptional riparian and floodplain ecosystem. Ecological and agricultural resources contribute to an area rich in biological diversity. Some of the key resources to be avoided or mitigated for are: extensive high-quality wetlands and riparian areas, including plains cottonwood riparian forests, willow shrublands, freshwater marshes and wet meadows; tallgrass prairie communities; extremely high densities of the threatened Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse and its critical habitat; and Ute ladies’ tresses orchid populations, a rare wetland plant designated as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

What are the impacts to the wetlands?

The flood mitigation project is in the final stages of design and is subject to change, but the current estimate of wetland impacts is 5.9 acres of temporary impacts, 6.2 acres of permanent impacts for a total of 12.1 acres. We expect to be able to fully mitigate the impacts on the CU South property, which is currently owned by the university but will transfer to the city upon certain conditions of the annexation agreement being met.

The university will be required to comply with local, state and federal permit requirements to mitigate any wetland impacts created by its development plan.

Is there a plan in the project for restoration?

This project will follow environmental regulations to limit and mitigate impacts. This will include a significant environmental restoration component. Newly restored natural areas are expected to be added to city open space. This project includes preservation and restoration to improve the natural ecosystem, reconnect the historic floodplain and compensate for unavoidable environmental impacts.

The existing natural resources in the project area are highly dependent on current groundwater patterns. How will the project maintain existing groundwater conditions after the project is built?

Groundwater conveyance systems are common engineering features. From an environmental perspective, replication of existing groundwater conditions is essential in preserving wetlands. The SBC flood project requires a functioning ground water conveyance system that successfully replicates existing conditions both for dam safety and environmental purposes. To do this, the project team is using existing data, and groundwater and surface water data collected since February 2018 to develop a baseline groundwater model to represent existing conditions. The project issuing this model to design a groundwater conveyance system that maintains the existing conditions and will be required to work fully for as long as project features that tie into bedrock (i.e. the floodwall and detention dam) are in place. There will also be monitoring of the groundwater conditions around the project area to verify that the groundwater system is working as designed.

Why build flood detention? Why not just convey flood water in South Boulder Creek?

Boulder’s Stormwater and Flood Utility prefers a “conveyance” approach – keeping floodwater in the creek channel - to flood management where conditions allow. In situations such as South Boulder Creek south of US36 where conveyance of flood waters would increase flooding above existing conditions, detention is used as an alternative flood mitigation tool. The project will integrate environmental and aesthetic features into the overall project design as has been the city’s practice on flood utility projects.

What will happen to the existing levee?

The existing levee will be removed as part of the project. This will allow for the historic floodplain to be reconnected and construction of environmental mitigation. FEMA is the regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the levee.

Why is the city investing so much on this project?

The city does not currently have a citywide cost benefit comparison for its 16 drainageways. Each drainageway is evaluated through a lifecycle process of mapping, mitigation planning, design and construction that does not readily lend itself to a city-wide cost/benefit comparison since each drainageway is at a different point in the lifecycle and since there are many other factors that impact the viability of projects besides costs and benefits. Regardless of the selection criteria, South Boulder Creek is considered a high priority because of the identified flood risk, flood benefits from the project, damage experienced during the 2013 flood and direction from City Council.

Racial Equity Tool

The City of Boulder has an important role to play in welcoming, supporting and serving people of diverse backgrounds in our community and in government processes. While we have done valuable equity work in the past, including the creation of a diversity policy two decades ago, an inclusivity assessment conducted in 2017 showed us that our impact has been limited. The city is currently incorporating the use of a Racial Equity Assessment Tool into project approach and implementation. While still relatively new, the hope is that applying the racial equity lens to projects such as this will create more equitable delivery of services.