Section 1 – Background

  • This report is for City Council information only and requires no action by City Council.
  • The investment of City funds is guided by and this report is submitted in compliance with the City’s Investment Ordinance. (Chapter 2-10, Investment of City Funds, Boulder Revised Code 1981).
  • The investment objectives as specified in the Ordinance are:
    • The primary objective is preservation and protection of capital. This objective reduces the risk to which the portfolio can be subjected. To comply with this objective investments are diversified by type and maturity horizons.
    • The second objective is to maintain adequate liquidity to meet the daily cash needs of the City. The City’s Ordinance requires that 5% of the portfolio matures within 30 days.
    • Yield is the third objective. The City strives to maximize return while minimizing the risks of the market.

Section 2 – Market Conditions, the Federal Reserve and the Yield Curve

  • Investment outlook: Higher inflation driven by energy prices was a common theme in Q2, as the war in the Middle East impacted oil prices. A ceasefire and an initial agreement to end the conflict moderated the effect on energy prices as the quarter ended, but the resumption of normal supplies from the Arabian Gulf is only slowly building momentum.
  • A new regime at the Federal Reserve: The Fed entered a new era under Chair Kevin Warsh, removing forward guidance and reviewing key policy frameworks. Although rates were unchanged in Q2 at a range of 3.5%–3.75%, the Fed adopted a more hawkish tone at the June meeting, supported by higher inflation and labor market stability.
  • US economic growth improved: Data released in the second quarter pointed to economic expansion. Real GDP growth was revised up to 2.1% annualized for Q2, supported by investment, exports and government spending, versus 0.5% growth in Q1.
  • Inflation data surprised on the upside: Headline CPI accelerated to 4.2% year-on-year in May. The core inflation measure, which excludes food and energy, also rose but less substantially, reaching 2.9%. Meanwhile, the Fed’s preferred Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) measure increased to 4.1%, reflecting energy price pressures and persistent underlying inflation.
  • Labor market conditions stabilized: Unemployment remained low at 4.2% and the year-on-year growth rate of average hourly earnings was 3.5%.
  • The S&P 500 Index rose on strong earnings and hopes of peace: Equity markets rallied over the quarter, with the S&P 500 Index generating a return of 15.2%.
  • Risks include: Policy uncertainty, geopolitical shocks, and potential decreases in growth as a result of elevated prices.

US Treasury Yields

Source: Bloomberg
Treasury SecurityJune 30, 2026june 30, 2025Change
3 Month Bill3.81%4.29%-0.48%
6 Month Bill3.97%4.25%-0.28%
1 Year Note3.98%3.97%0.01%
2 Year Note4.17%3.72%0.45%
3 Year Note4.18%3.69%0.49%
5 Year Note4.23%3.80%0.43%
10 Year Note4.47%4.23%0.24%

Section 3 – The City’s Portfolio

  • Portfolio strategies implemented this quarter and the investments held in the portfolio comply with the City’s investment objectives and the Ordinance that specifies allowable investments.
    • The objective of safety is achieved through a well-diversified portfolio invested primarily in US Treasury and Agency securities of various maturities. In March 2017 the City Council approved amendments to the Investment Policy proposed by finance staff expanding opportunities to further diversify the portfolio. Pursuit of further diversification through the revised policies is progressing strategically relative to market conditions. Market risk is managed by maintaining a moderate weighted average final maturity (WAM) in the City’s portfolio. As of June 30, 2026, the WAM of the operating portfolio is 2.24 years while the Ordinance allows for a WAM of up to 5 years.
    • The City maintains sufficient liquidity. A minimum of 5% of the City’s total portfolio is held in liquidity accounts.
    • As of June 30, the weighted average purchase yield for the operating portfolio holdings is 4.13%. The yield benchmark is the six-month trailing average of the yield on the 2-year Treasury note, which is 3.78 as of June 30. The purchase yield on the operating portfolio as of June 30 exceeds the benchmark yield by 0.35%.
    • For the second quarter 2026, the fair value periodic return on the operating portfolio is 0.46%. The 1-3 Treasury Index return for the period is 0.39%. The periodic return on the operating portfolio for the second quarter is 0.07% higher than the 1-3 Treasury Index return.
  • The City’s portfolio does not hold any investments in the following: fossil fuels inclusive of pipeline construction and extraction; firearms or weapons not used in national defense; tobacco companies; and firms related to mass incarceration/private prisons/detention centers.
  • In the second quarter 2026, the City’s investment advisor invested approximately $38 million in long-term securities for the operating portfolio. Purchases included US Treasury and Agency securities and corporate bonds. The weighted average purchase yield of these investments is 4.10% and the weighted average maturity at the time of purchase is 3.78 years.
  • The portfolio duration maintains exposure to longer-term interest rates and the portfolio is well diversified to various market sectors which may enhance the portfolio’s return over time.

Summary of Portfolio Characteristics

Portfolio Characteristicjune 30, 2026March 31, 2026
Average Final Maturity (years)2.242.24
Effective Duration (years)1.991.99
Average Purchase Yield4.13%4.12%
Average Market Yield4.18%3.92%
Average Credit Quality (S&P/Moody's)AA/Aa2AA/Aa2
Total Market Value ($)486,442,032484,845,518

Asset Allocation and Effective Duration

AssetHistoric CostDuration (years)% Portfolio
Cash and Equivalents537,9550.000%
Corporate Bonds121,855,0961.8325%
Government Agencies161,148,0291.9734%
Treasury Securities198,716,5202.1141%
Total482,257,6001.99100%

Final Maturity Distribution

DurationHistoric Cost% Portfolio
Under 90 days33,814,5497%
90-179 days31,159,4356%
180 days to 1 year30,694,1916%
1 to 2 years122,968,63326%
2 to 3 years126,461,51127%
3 to 4 years83,308,24517%
4 to 5 years48,869,98110%
Over 5 years4,981,0551%
Total482,257,600100%

Portfolio Holdings as of June 30, 2026

IssuerHistoric Cost% Portfolio
US Treasury198,716,52041.21%
Federal Farm Credit Banks63,277,22513.12%
Federal Home Loan Bank63,050,09213.07%
Federal National Mortgage Association28,390,9745.89%
John Deere Capital Corp18,754,2803.89%
State Street Corp17,606,4653.65%
Toyota Motor Credit Corp13,245,7362.75%
Cisco Systems Inc13,227,0152.74%
Home Depot Inc/The12,759,1102.65%
PepsiCo Inc11,703,1872.43%
Eli Lilly & Co9,161,9211.90%
Colgate-Palmolive Co8,514,6241.77%
Caterpillar Financial Services Corp7,950,4421.65%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp6,429,7381.33%
Procter & Gamble Co4,583,6550.95%
Johnson & Johnson2,217,9120.46%
Microsoft Corp2,130,7500.44%
Cash537,9550.11%
Total Historic Cost482,257,600100.00%

Section 4 - The City’s Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Initiative

The City’s investment framework includes considering socially responsible investment factors. The City’s SRI program intends to allow the City to better achieve its sustainability and resilience goals, remain financially strong and better align community values. The program incorporates the strategies described below.

Exclusionary Screening

Exclusionary screening, or negative screening, is the process of excluding from investment certain sectors or companies involved in activities which are unacceptable or controversial. Investments for the City’s portfolio exclude the following sectors:

  • Fossil fuels inclusive of pipeline construction and extraction
  • Firearms or weapons not used in national defense
  • Tobacco companies
  • Firms related to mass incarceration/private prisons/detention centers

Included in these negative screens is the prohibition of financial firms associated with pipeline construction. The City has further applied this limitation on financial firms to the group of broker/dealers through which investments may be transacted and the City has taken steps to remove any money market funds or cash pools that invest in the above sectors.

Positive Screening and Impact Investing

Positive screening and impact investing consider the impact that an investment is making. This strategy has been implemented through the purchase of a municipal bond issued for the construction and management of affordable housing. Other potential impact investing opportunities include investing in securities issued by the World Bank, which is an approved asset class per the City’s investment policy.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Integration

The City’s goal is to bring ESG integration to the heart of the investment decision process. The City monitors the ESG ratings provided by MSCI for the corporate bonds in the portfolio. The MSCI ratings are provided on a scale of 1 to 10 with ten being the highest. At this time, the weighted average Industry-Adjusted Score from MSCI for the corporate bond holdings is 7.4 which maps to a letter rated of “AA” on a scale of triple-C to triple-A.

The City also monitors the unadjusted Pillar Scores from MSCI for the corporate holdings. At this time, the weighted average Pillar Scores for the corporate bond holdings are as follows:

  • MSCI Environmental Pillar Score: 6.7
  • MSCI Social Pillar Score: 5.4
  • MSCI Governance Pillar Score: 5.8

The City’s ESG model can be refined to reflect the issues that matter most to the residents of Boulder by applying customized weights to the MSCI Pillar Scores, thus creating ESG scores that better reflect the City’s values, goals and policies.

Active Ownership/Corporate Engagement

Corporate engagement involves discussions with issuers about ESG risks and opportunities. The City is partnering with Insight Investment to seek the benefits of this goal. Insight requests and participates in meetings with management to understand key risks and potentially influence outcomes. Company engagement is critical to Insight’s credit process and their analysts meet with issuers to address ESG factors as well as other credit-related concerns or questions.