Site Review Summary
The discretionary review process called Site Review is available to modify certain development standards of the city's land use code. The purpose of Site Review, as described in Section 9-2-14(a), is to promote the most appropriate use of land, to improve the character and quality of new development, to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities, to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space, to ensure compatible architecture, massing and height of buildings with existing, approved, and known to be planned or projected buildings in the immediate area, to ensure human scale development, to promote the safety and convenience of pedestrians, bicyclists and other modes within and around developments and to implement the goals and policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans of the community.
Modifications That May Be Requested
Specific sections of the land use regulations may be modified through Site Review (see list below). Some examples of the major categories of modifications that may be requested in a Site Review are:
- Setback Modifications
- Most zoning districts have specific minimum requirements for the setback of buildings from any property line. Alternative setbacks, referred to as setback modifications, can be considered through the Site Review process if the alternatives result in improved site design consistent with the Site Review criteria. Setback variances may also be considered by the Board of Zoning Adjustment and Building Appeals. However, their approval is limited to certain hardship circumstances where it is not possible to comply with the standard setbacks due to unusual characteristics of the site.
- Parking Reductions
- A reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces. Parking reductions over 25% require Site Review approval. Parking reductions over 50% require approval by Planning Board. Some parking reductions, as permitted by Section 9-9-6(f), can be considered by city staff as an Administrative Review (without a Site Review).
- Height Modification
- Building height over the "by-right" standard up to the 55 foot height limit, with the exception of buildings which meet the conditional height criteria of Section 9-7-6. Height above the “by-right” standard can be considered through the Site Review process, if the height and building design are demonstrated to be consistent with the Site Review criteria, and if eligible per Section 9-2-14(b)(1)(E). Some height modifications (called height bonuses and discussed below) require additional community benefit requirements for buildings that include a 4th or 5th story. There is also an administrative Site Review (no required Planning Board meeting) for height modifications to buildings that do not exceed the permitted height for principal buildings but are on sites where height is restricted below 35 feet due to nonstandard lot size (see Section 9-10-3). Height modifications for accessory buildings may also be reviewed in this procedure if the reason for the height is due to topography.
Land Use Intensity Modifications
Modifications to minimum open space on lots, floor area ratio, maximum height, and number of dwelling units per acre requirements may be approved pursuant to the standards of subparagraph 9-2-14(h)(6) if found to be consistent with the requirements and criteria of Site Review by Planning Board.
- In the DT, BMS, BR-2, and MU-3 zoning districts, the open space requirements may be reduced.
- In the BMS, BR-1, IMS, IS, MU-1, and MU-2 zoning districts, the density and floor area of a building may be increased above the maximum, provided the building meets the requirements for a height bonus.
- A building proposed with a fourth or fifth story or addition that exceeds the permitted height requirements, together with any additional floor area or residential density, may be approved if specific community benefit requirements and other design criteria are met.
Minimum and Maximum Thresholds
Minimum and maximum thresholds apply to Site Review applications. These threshold categories are based on various measurements of a project's size - either total building floor area, land parcel size or in some case, number of units. A project that exceeds any of the Site Review maximum thresholds must complete a Site Review - "by-right" development is not permitted. Concept Plan Review is also required prior to Site Review. Review thresholds for Site Review in Section 9-2-14(b)(1).
If a project is large enough to meet any of the minimum thresholds, then it is eligible for a Site Review. If a project is smaller than the minimum thresholds standard, it is not eligible for Site Review.
As an example, a project with four residential units in the RL-1 zoning district may not complete a Site Review since it does not meet the minimum threshold, but a 50 unit project in the same zoning district must complete a Site Review because it exceeds the maximum threshold.
Off-Site Affordable Housing
Additional review is necessary when a development proposes to provide “off-site” affordable units on a different site than the one that generates the inclusionary housing requirement. The affordable housing review can be done through a voluntary or required Site Review. If the off-site development does not undergo these reviews, an Affordable Housing Design Review is required through an administrative review process. For more information review see Chapter 9-13.
Site Review Process
Applications for Site Reviews are received by the Planning and Development Services Center and are reviewed through the Land Use Review process, including public notification. The initial review of the application takes approximately three weeks from the start of the review track. If your application requires subsequent revisions, each additional staff review of the revisions will also take about three weeks from the start of the review track. Site Review projects must be found to meet the applicable review criteria listed in Section 9-2-14. A list of the Site Review criteria is attached to this document.
For certain types of Site Review applications, the Planning and Development Services Department submits a recommendation to the Planning Board. The board holds a public hearing and makes a decision. Staff may also refer applications to the Planning Board that it finds to be inconsistent with the Site Review criteria or if staff finds the application warrants board review.
Planning Board action is required for Site Reviews that include the following modifications or requests:
- A reduction in off-street parking of more than fifty percent subject to compliance with the standards of Subsection 9-9-6(f).
- A reduction of the open space or lot area requirements allowed by Paragraph 9-2-14(h)(6).
- An application for any principal or accessory building above the permitted height for principal buildings set forth in Section 9-7-1.
- An application for which the applicant intends to establish Vested Property Rights (Section 9-2-20)
All other Site Review applications may be decided by the Planning and Development Services Department. Planning and Development Services Department decisions on Site Reviews are final after a 14-day "call-up" period. These decisions may be called up by the Planning Board for a public hearing and decision or appealed to the Planning Board by the applicant or any interested person. All Site Review decisions are issued in a document called a "Notice of Disposition." The disposition specifies approval, approval with conditions (and lists those conditions), or denial.
The applicant must obtain applicable building permits and start construction within three years from the date of final approval (or as modified by a development agreement). If a project is not begun within three years or according to the project's development agreement and no extensions have been approved pursuant to Section 9-2-12, the approval expires. Minor modifications and minor amendments to approved Site Review plans may be applied for, in accordance with city code.