Section 1 – Background

  • This report is for City Council information only and requires no action by City Council.
  • The investment of City funds is guided by and this report is submitted in compliance with the City's Investment Ordinance. (Chapter 2-10, Investment of City Funds, Boulder Revised Code 1981).
  • The investment objectives as specified in the Ordinance are:
    • The primary objective is preservation and protection of capital. This objective reduces the risk to which the portfolio can be subjected. To comply with this objective investments are diversified by type and maturity horizons.
    • The second objective is to maintain adequate liquidity to meet the daily cash needs of the City. The City's Ordinance requires that 5% of the portfolio matures within 30 days.
    • Yield is the third objective. The City strives to maximize return while minimizing the risks of the market.

Section 2 – Market Conditions, the Federal Reserve and the Yield Curve

  • Navigating market volatility: US tariff uncertainty is likely to drag on growth while lifting short-term inflation risks, prompting caution from the Fed. While near-term data is resilient, structural shifts in trade and policy uncertainty are likely to cause growth to stagnate.
  • The Fed remained on hold: The Federal Open Market Committee remained on hold in the second quarter with the Fed funds target rate in a range of 4.25%-4.50%. At the June meeting, the Committee continued to forecast 50 basis points of rate decreases this year.
  • Yield curve steepened: A softer economic outlook drove short-term yields lower, while persistent concerns over US debt sustainability pushed long-term yields higher. Two-year yields ended the quarter at 3.72%, 16 basis points lower. At the longer end of the curve, 30-year yields ended the quarter at 4.77%, 20 basis points higher.
  • Credit spreads tightened: Aggregate credit spreads narrowed, with the spread of the Bloomberg US Corporate Index ending 11 basis points lower over the quarter.
  • The S&P 500 Index rallied strongly in Q2: Equity markets experienced a volatile quarter, with the S&P 500 Index falling dramatically in early April before rallying to a new all-time high by quarter end. This resulted in a close to 11% return over the quarter as a whole, taking the return over the first half of the year into positive territory.
  • Risks include:
    • Fiscal and trade policy shifts by the new administration are increasing forecasting uncertainty.
    • The Fed may keep policy tighter than necessary, exacerbating the risks to growth.
    • Escalating tariffs raise global recession risks.
    • Persistent geopolitical tensions, especially US-China rivalry, increase the potential for market volatility.

US Treasury Yields

Source: Bloomberg
Treasury SecurityJune 30, 2025June 30, 2024Change
3 Month Bill4.29%5.36%-1.07%
6 Month Bill4.25%5.32%-1.07%
1 Year Note3.97%5.11%-1.14%
2 Year Note3.72%4.75%-1.03%
3 Year Note3.69%4.55%-0.86%
5 Year Note3.80%4.38%-0.58%
10 Year Note4.23%4.40%-0.17%

Section 3 – The City's Portfolio

  • Portfolio strategies implemented this quarter and the investments held in the portfolio comply with the City's investment objectives and the Ordinance that specifies allowable investments.
    • The objective of safety is achieved through a well-diversified portfolio invested primarily in US Treasury and Agency securities of various maturities. In March 2017 the City Council approved amendments to the Investment Policy proposed by finance staff expanding opportunities to further diversify the portfolio. Pursuit of further diversification through the revised policies is progressing strategically relative to market conditions. Market risk is managed by maintaining a moderate weighted average final maturity (WAM) in the City's portfolio. As of June 30, 2025, the WAM of the operating portfolio is 2.21 years while the Ordinance allows for a WAM of up to 5 years.
    • The City maintains sufficient liquidity. A minimum of 5% of the City's total portfolio is held in liquidity accounts.
    • As of June 30, the weighted average purchase yield for the operating portfolio holdings 4.07%. The yield benchmark is the six-month trailing average of the yield on the 2-year Treasury note, which is 4.01% as of June 30. The purchase yield on the operating portfolio as of June 30 exceeds the benchmark yield by 0.06%.
    • For the second quarter 2025, the fair value periodic return on the operating portfolio is 1.28%. The 1-3 Treasury Index return for the period is 1.18%. The periodic return on the operating portfolio for the second quarter is 0.10% higher than the 1-3 Treasury Index return.
  • The City's portfolio does not hold any investments in the following: fossil fuels inclusive of pipeline construction and extraction; firearms or weapons not used in national defense; tobacco companies; and firms related to mass incarceration/private prisons/detention centers.
  • In the second quarter 2025, the City's investment advisor invested approximately $35 million in long-term securities for the operating portfolio. Purchases included US Treasury and Agency securities and corporate bonds. The weighted average purchase yield of these investments is 4.19% and the weighted average maturity at the time of purchase is 3.5 years.
  • The portfolio duration maintains exposure to longer-term interest rates and the portfolio is well diversified to various market sectors which may enhance the portfolio's return over time.

Summary of Portfolio Characteristics

Portfolio characteristics comparing June 30, 2025 to March 31, 2025
Portfolio CharacteristicJune 30, 2025March 31, 2025
Average Final Maturity (years)2.212.12
Effective Duration (years)1.961.93
Average Purchase Yield4.07%4.01%
Average Market Yield3.91%4.10%
Average Credit Quality (S&P/Moody's)AA/Aa2AA/Aa1
Total Market Value ($)462,095,559486,108,635

Asset Allocation and Effective Duration

AssetHistoric CostDuration (years)% Portfolio
Cash and Equivalents10,143,5570.002%
Corporate Bonds102,471,0271.5023%
Government Agencies141,843,2832.2731%
Treasury Securities199,481,6802.0744%
Total453,939,5481.96100%

Final Maturity Distribution

DurationHistoric Cost% Portfolio
Under 90 days42,614,13910%
90-179 days23,211,1825%
180 days to 1 year69,717,59715%
1 to 2 years64,869,88214%
2 to 3 years110,848,35024%
3 to 4 years76,604,15517%
4 to 5 years66,074,24315%
Total453,939,548100%

Portfolio Holdings as of June 30, 2025

IssuerHistoric Cost% Portfolio
US Treasury199,481,68043.94%
Federal Farm Credit Banks63,174,97413.92%
Federal Home Loan Bank46,295,18510.20%
State Street Corp18,671,8784.11%
Federal National Mortgage Association16,607,3223.66%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp15,765,8023.47%
Home Depot Inc/The14,704,2503.24%
Cisco Systems Inc13,227,0152.91%
John Deere Capital Corp13,082,0602.88%
Colgate-Palmolive Co10,754,9102.37%
Caterpillar Financial Services Corp10,472,4512.31%
Cash10,143,5572.23%
PepsiCo Inc8,213,3721.81%
Microsoft Corp6,508,4301.43%
Toyota Motor Credit Corp4,618,7501.02%
Johnson & Johnson2,217,9120.49%
Total Historic Cost453,939,548100.00%

Section 4 - The City's Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Initiative

The City's investment framework includes considering socially responsible investment factors. The City's SRI program intends to allow the City to better achieve its sustainability and resilience goals, remain financially strong and better align community values. The program incorporates the strategies described below.

Exclusionary Screening

Exclusionary screening, or negative screening, is the process of excluding from investment certain sectors or companies involved in activities which are unacceptable or controversial. Investments for the City's portfolio exclude the following sectors:

  • Fossil fuels inclusive of pipeline construction and extraction
  • Firearms or weapons not used in national defense
  • Tobacco companies
  • Firms related to mass incarceration/private prisons/detention centers

Included in these negative screens is the prohibition of financial firms associated with pipeline construction. The City has further applied this limitation on financial firms to the group of broker/dealers through which investments may be transacted and the City has taken steps to remove any money market funds or cash pools that invest in the above sectors.

Positive Screening and Impact Investing

Positive screening and impact investing consider the impact that an investment is making. This strategy has been implemented through the purchase of a municipal bond issued for the construction and management of affordable housing. Other potential impact investing opportunities include investing in securities issued by the World Bank, which is an approved asset class per the City's investment policy.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Integration

The City's goal is to bring ESG integration to the heart of the investment decision process. The City monitors the ESG ratings provided by MSCI for the corporate bonds in the portfolio. The MSCI ratings are provided on a scale of 1 to 10 with ten being the highest. At this time, the weighted average Industry-Adjusted Score from MSCI for the corporate bond holdings is 7.6 which maps to a letter rated of "AA" on a scale of triple-C to triple-A.

The City also monitors the unadjusted Pillar Scores from MSCI for the corporate holdings. At this time, the weighted average Pillar Scores for the corporate bond holdings are as follows:

  • MSCI Environmental Pillar Score: 6.5
  • MSCI Social Pillar Score: 5.6
  • MSCI Governance Pillar Score: 6.0

The City's ESG model can be refined to reflect the issues that matter most to the citizens of Boulder by applying customized weights to the MSCI Pillar Scores, thus creating ESG scores that better reflect the City's values, goals and policies.

Active Ownership/Corporate Engagement

Corporate engagement involves discussions with issuers about ESG risks and opportunities. The City is partnering with Insight Investment to seek the benefits of this goal. Insight requests and participates in meetings with management to understand key risks and potentially influence outcomes. Company engagement is critical to Insight’s credit process and their analysts meet with issuers to address ESG factors as well as other credit-related concerns or questions.