Planning & Development Services coordinates development reviews through a Land Use Review process. The various review types are listed on the Land Use Review Application Form and include annexation, site review, use review, form-based code review, and preliminary plat for subdivision. The Land Use Review process is summarized below.
Pre-Application
If you are considering filing a development review application, a pre-application review may be beneficial. An interdepartmental city staff team is available to answer questions about applicable regulations, application requirements, and how they may affect a project on a particular site. Many pre-application questions can be answered without need for a meeting. Occasionally, staff will determine that a meeting will be the most effective approach. In most cases, pre-application review is optional; however, there are certain types of projects and reviews for which city staff recommends a pre-application review. A pre-application review and meeting are required before an application for a form-based code review is filed. Please refer to the Pre-Application Review Guide for more information.
Application
Application forms are due by 10 a.m. on the business day prior to the application deadline to be considered for review on the next available track. Remaining application materials and fees are due by 10 a.m. on the application deadline. Track calendars are available on the Development Review and Plan Case Applications webpage, refer to the LUR Calendar for this application type. Please review the Development Review Application Guide for instructions on how to submit.
Review Schedule
- Application meeting (optional)
- Application submittal and initial city review (if needed)
- Applicant submits revised plans, city reviews
- Applicant makes final corrections (if needed)
- Decision (staff, boards)
- Final Technical Document Review Application
Each application is assigned to a "track" based on availability of staff resources to conduct the review. The track assigned determines the land use review schedule which the project will follow and helps applicants gauge the time needed to complete the review process. A generalized diagram of the land use review process appears below. Once a review track has been assigned, the city commits to this time schedule, assuming the applicant meets appropriate deadlines. In addition, the schedule may be accelerated, or a project may be placed on a later track based on the applicant's response time, the number of revisions, and staff, Planning Board or City Council work volume.
Reviewers
The land use review process includes review by the Development Review Committee (DRC) which is made up of representatives from city departments and other referral agencies. Each representative provides review comments about how the application complies with code and policy requirements within their area of responsibility. When the interests of individual departments diverge, developing consensus is the responsibility of the Policy Resolution Group (PRG), made up of supervisors of Planning and Development Services and the City Attorney's Office.
Initial Review and Review of Revised Plans
Public notice, by mail and posting a sign on the property, occurs during the initial review. The applicant is responsible for posting of a sign that is issued by the Planning and Development Services Center.
During a project's initial review, a summary of the city's findings, a list of requirements and informational comments are identified and given to the applicant in the form of Development Review Results and Comments.
Projects are reviewed for conformance with development standards and requirements and some are evaluated against qualitative design criteria. City comments and/or a decision are issued approximately three weeks after the start of the assigned review track.
Issuance of the Development Review Results and Comments concludes the services covered by the initial application fee. Any additional time spent by staff after this point is subject to hourly billing or by revision fees where applicable.
The case manager is available to meet with the applicant to review and discuss the city comments. After considering the issues identified in the initial review, the applicant is given the opportunity to propose revisions. Revisions must be submitted, or a written request for continuance received within 60 days from the date of city comments; otherwise, staff will either take action on the latest plans on file or the application is voided. Revised applications are evaluated by DRC staff members and review of revision comments are issued by the case manager within three weeks after the start of the assigned review track.
Decisions/Call-Ups/Appeals
Depending on the potential impact, Boulder's land use regulations assign approval authority to either city staff, Planning Board, or both Planning Board and City Council. After the completion of staff review, Planning & Development Services either issues a staff decision or refers the project to the Planning Board or City Council. For site review, use review, form-based code review and subdivision (at final plat review), a "Notice of Disposition" is issued. This is a one or two-page document stating the decision and listing any conditions of approval. These decisions are final after a 14-day "call-up" period. Staff-level decisions may be called up by the Planning Board for a final decision or appealed to the Planning Board by the applicant or any interested person. Planning Board and City Council decisions are also issued as Dispositions.
Several types of Land Use Review applications do not have dispositions issued and follow a slightly different review process at the time of the project decision. For example, out-of-city utility permits are approved by city staff and subject to a call-up by the City Council. Annexations follow a state law approval process, including a recommendation by the Planning Board and approval of an ordinance after two readings by City Council. For additional information on the steps towards a final decision for a particular application type, please refer to the application attachment for the review type or contact Planning and Development Services.
Expiration of Approval for Site, Use, and Form-Based Code Approvals
For site, use, and form-based code reviews, the applicant must sign a development agreement and file a final approved plan (containing the disposition of the approval) within 90 days. If this is not complied with, the approval expires. In some cases, a waiver of this expiration timeline can be requested.
The applicant must also begin and substantially complete the approved project within three years from the date of final approval (or as modified by a specific development schedule). If a project is not completed within three years, or according to the project's approved development schedule, the approval expires. If the project is not completed within this time frame, the applicant may request administrative extension of the development approval. Up to two six-month extensions can be granted by staff. After that, extensions can only be granted by the Planning Board, after a public hearing, and upon a showing by the applicant that reasonable diligence has been exercised to complete the project.