Applications will be reviewed by City of Boulder staff panels for Rounds 1 and 3. The Youth Opportunities and Advisory Board interns will be reviewing Round 2 applications. Panels will consist of three people and each panelist give each application a score of 0-10 with 0 representing “Does not meet evaluation criteria” and 10 representing “Clearly meets evaluation criteria.” Each score will be then weighted using percentages to calculate a total weighted score between 0-10. The highest-scored applications will be given priority for funding.
Alignment with Program Goals (20%)
The application clearly aligns with at least one of the Program Goals. The goals include:
- Increase opportunities for neighbors to meet and get to know each other
- Provide community-building resources to under-resourced neighborhoods
- Enhance community resilience, healing and joy through personal connections
Key Questions:
- Does the application clearly specify which of the three goals they are meeting?
- How does the applicant specify they will meet these goals?
Equity and Inclusion (20%)
This application clearly shows how they plan to get diverse participation in their neighborhood and uses equitable distribution practices to reach all homes within community. This application aligns with Racial Equity goals set by the City of Boulder.
Key Questions:
- Does the project engage a broad segment of the community, including marginalized or underrepresented groups?
Impact and Outcomes (15%)
Outcomes and impact are clearly identified in application building community resilience and connection.
Key Questions:
- What are the short-term and long-term impacts of the on the community?
- Will funding this application address a specific neighborhood challenge or benefit a particular underserved group?
Community Involvement and Collaboration (20%)
The application demonstrates plans to involve the community in its planning.
Key Questions:
- How are neighbors involved in the proposal?
- Does the proposal leverage partnerships or collaborate with other communities or organizations?
Feasibility and Sustainability (15%)
The proposal is realistic and feasible within the proposed timeframe.
Key Questions:
- Are the proposal’s goals achievable with the proposed timeline?
Budget and Cost-Effectiveness (10%)
The proposal has a planned budget planned that is reasonable and aligned with the Neighborhood Connection Fund.
Key Questions:
- Is the budget clear and provide the requested details?
- Are there other funding sources or in-kind contributions that supplement the budget?